Label claims, dose research, brand ownership, prices and review history — connected for one exact product, with every source visible.
Deep research across 10 public sources — then we show you the sources.
Free · no affiliate links · no brand pays us
Every answer names its source and its limits. Confirmed facts, documented cautions and honest gaps stay visually separate — and each check links to how it works.
The front of the pack says 8,000 mg. The panel says 400 mg. We show which number is in the capsule, and name why they differ.
Read the method →Direct NIH and study links put the declared dose next to published ranges, and flag a serving above the NIH upper limit.
Read the method →A dated review history shows steady growth or a burst — and whether the total is plausible for how long the brand has existed.
Read the method →Single facts are ordinary. We report when a review burst, a parked domain, a young trademark and pooled reviews co-occur on one listing.
See the rules →Exact USPTO records give the owner, entity type, filed address and country — so you know who answers if something goes wrong.
See the evidence rules →“Made in USA” can describe only the bottling. We check what origin the listing claims and what public records show.
Read the method →Badge claims are checked at the issuer. A registry entry counts; a badge with no lab, certificate or registry entry does not.
Read the method →Every comparison needs the same barcode. Without one, a listing cannot be matched to certifications, recalls or another retailer at all.
See the identity rule →Prices are compared only between sellers publishing the same barcode, alongside FDA recall and enforcement records.
Read the method →The point is not to X-ray a bottle for effect. It is to connect the same exact product across its claim, facts panel, owner, history and research — then make the useful comparison visible.
The front says 9,000 mg of creatine; the panel assigns 5,000 mg to creatine and the rest to other actives.
The label math is physically consistent, the UPC is corroborated and the exact USPTO owner is identified.
The panel gives a research-comparable melatonin dose, while its herbal blend publishes only one combined total.
Give your AI agent the product link and this instruction; it can resolve the record, read the structured evidence, and return the answer with sources.
Check this exact product using LookCloser. Start at https://lookcloser.ai/llms.txt. Return the most useful product-specific finding, what checked out, documented cautions, ownership, dose and research context, review or price signals, unresolved evidence, and source links. Missing data is not a strike. Product: [paste product link]
Copy agent instructions